CerbiShield is where policy becomes an operated control: define it, validate it, target it, deploy it, observe what happens, and retain the evidence needed to explain the outcome later.
Policy lifecycle
Create or select a governance rule/profile.
Test the policy before changing live enforcement.
Choose the workload and environment the policy should govern.
Publish policy to the selected CerbiStream or Gateway enforcement boundary.
Review violations, posture, health, and operational signals.
Use evidence, reports, and audit context to explain the control afterward.
Interactive product tour
Hover, focus, or tap the numbered points. These are real August Dashboard captures. The preview was not connected to a live customer Azure deployment, so empty states are preserved instead of being replaced with fabricated production activity.
Validation Lab
Violations Explorer
Current product tour
The current Dashboard candidate contains dedicated operational surfaces rather than one executive score page. The useful question is what decision each surface helps a team make.
The operational landing view brings governance posture, workload metrics, trend signals, attention items, and platform health into one place so teams can see where action is required.
What it proves
Is governance healthy right now?
Create and inspect governance rules using templates, guided composition, and structured editing. Validate compatibility before choosing a target and environment for deployment.
What it proves
What policy are we asking the platform to enforce?
Manage deployment targets and review rollout state, target context, environment, status, and deployment detail rather than treating policy as an untracked configuration file.
What it proves
Where is this policy active?
Move from severity and trend views into workload, rule, profile, field, and time-window drill-down so remediation starts from evidence instead of an aggregate score alone.
What it proves
What is violating policy, and where?
Exercise governance rules against representative payloads before promotion into a live enforcement path and inspect field-level results before a rollout.
What it proves
Will the policy behave the way we expect?
Keep bounded governance evidence around policy decisions and enforcement outcomes so security, engineering, and review teams can work from the same record.
What it proves
What evidence supports the control?
Track governance score, coverage, violation and deployment trends, usage, and other operational signals over time instead of evaluating governance only during an audit window.
What it proves
Are we improving or regressing?
Review actor, action, resource, target, version, status, and timestamp context around governance changes and operational activity.
What it proves
Who changed what, and when?
Inspect service health, response-time signals, queue and database state, routing activity, errors, and other platform-operability indicators from the same environment.
What it proves
Is the governance platform itself healthy?
Make the relationships between the Dashboard, routing layer, internal services, and customer-hosted dependencies visible during setup and diagnosis.
What it proves
Can the control plane reach what it depends on?
Gateway + Dashboard
The Dashboard does not need to become another log viewer. Its job is to manage the governance state around the telemetry path: which policy was signed, where it was targeted, whether deployment succeeded, what violations occurred, and whether the platform is healthy.
Explore GatewayCerbiShield
Policy · targets · deployment · evidence
Cerbi Gateway
Verify · govern · forward
Dashboard
Violations · health · audit · reporting
Existing backend
Search · alert · retain · visualize
Enterprise controls
The current Dashboard includes AI-oriented surfaces and actions for contextual assistance. Core governance still works without AI: policy definition, validation, deployment, Gateway/CerbiStream enforcement, evidence, reporting, audit, and health remain deterministic platform functions.
That separation matters in regulated environments where AI use may be restricted independently from the governance control itself.
A walkthrough should follow one policy from definition through validation, deployment, enforcement, violation/evidence review, and health rather than bouncing between pretty screens.
Request a Dashboard walkthrough[ cerbi ] · Choose the boundary
Use CerbiStream inside selected applications, Cerbi Gateway at the OpenTelemetry boundary, or both. CerbiShield controls signed policy, rollout, evidence, and audit across either path.
