Telemetry is a security surface. Treat it like one.

Applications can emit PII, credentials, tokens, identifiers, and regulated payloads into telemetry before SIEM, APM, or downstream redaction can protect them. Cerbi connects pre-deployment discovery, runtime enforcement, and retained evidence under one policy lifecycle without replacing the observability stack.

Telemetry moves faster than governance.

The failure is rarely that an organization has no logging standard. The failure is that the standard is disconnected from source, runtime enforcement, rollout, and evidence.

01

The first telemetry copy can already be exposure

PII, credentials, tokens, payloads, and other restricted values can leave an application and propagate through collectors, queues, archives, and destinations before anyone notices them in a search result or audit review.

02

Logging standards drift across teams

Required fields, severity conventions, names, schemas, and exceptions become team-specific unless the organization has an authoritative policy lifecycle.

03

Downstream cleanup is not the same as prevention

Redaction at the final analytics destination can reduce exposure there, but it does not govern every earlier copy, route, archive, processor, or secondary destination.

04

Evidence is usually reconstructed after the fact

Teams often know the intended standard but cannot quickly show which policy was active, where it applied, what violated it, and how enforcement changed over time.

Find it before deployment. Stop it at runtime. Prove the policy was enforced.

SAST, OpenTelemetry processors, logger filters, and downstream redaction are useful controls. Cerbi connects the governance lifecycle across source discovery, deliberate targeting, multiple enforcement boundaries, rollout, and retained evidence.

Start with evidence

Cerbi Scanner can surface concrete logging risk before a runtime deployment, giving the pilot a measurable problem instead of a category-level promise.

Treat policy as a lifecycle

CerbiShield manages governance rules, validation, targeting, deployment history, violations, reporting, audit, and operational evidence as one system.

Choose the enforcement boundary

Use CerbiStream inside selected applications, Cerbi Gateway on selected OpenTelemetry traffic, or both under the same governance program.

Keep the observability investment

Cerbi governs telemetry before the sink without asking you to replace Splunk, Datadog, Elastic, Azure Monitor, OpenTelemetry, SIEM, APM, dashboards, or alerts.

Keep runtime processing customer-hosted

CerbiShield and the Marketplace Gateway architecture run in the customer Azure environment rather than requiring a shared Cerbi raw-log relay.

Make governance reviewable

Retain bounded evidence around policy, deployment, violations, validation, reporting, audit activity, and platform health so teams can review what actually happened.

Do not make every workload adopt Cerbi the same way.

Some applications justify closest-to-emission enforcement. Other estates already have OpenTelemetry routes that are easier to govern centrally. Cerbi supports both without changing the downstream destination strategy.

CerbiStream · in-process

Selected applications

Execute policy inside the application process when governance should happen before its first network hop.

Explore CerbiStream

Gateway · OTLP boundary

Available with CerbiShield

Existing OpenTelemetry estates

Route selected OTLP traffic through a customer-hosted governance boundary without adding a Cerbi application SDK to workloads that already emit OTLP.

Explore Gateway

Less risk. More consistency. Evidence you can inspect.

  • Reduce the chance that sensitive values propagate into downstream telemetry systems
  • Create one governance model across selected application and OTLP enforcement paths
  • Standardize required fields, schemas, naming, and prohibited content across teams
  • Give platform, security, and audit stakeholders evidence instead of screenshots and tribal knowledge
  • Adopt incrementally without replacing the logging and observability stack already in production

The first useful question is not “Can we deploy Cerbi everywhere?”

It is “Can Cerbi show us a real logging problem and govern one workload better than we do today?” Start there.

Plan a bounded pilot

Move from a governance signal to what needs fixing.

Violations Explorer is designed to break findings down by severity, rule, workload, and trend so policy failures become an investigation workflow instead of a downstream search exercise.

Current CerbiShield Violations Explorer showing severity, violation rate, top rules, and investigation views
Real August 2026 release-preview capture. The preview tenant intentionally contains no customer violation data.
NEXTChoose your next proof

Use CerbiStream inside selected applications, Cerbi Gateway at the OpenTelemetry boundary, or both. CerbiShield keeps policy, rollout, violations, audit, and evidence under one governance program.

One initial workload/Customer-hosted in Azure/Existing destinations remain
Why Cerbi | The Case for Logging Governance at Emission