Resource broker
Why
One machine, several competing workloads.
Tactic
Measure memory first, then allow, queue, or deny work before it can destabilize the host.
Measured experiments in local AI, agent evaluation, reliability, and the systems behind Cerbi. Short on hype, long on outcomes.
What this is
The goal is to make local agents measurably better at useful work while keeping the machine recoverable, the experiments disposable, and sensitive data local.
These are experiments and measured build notes, not product commitments or roadmap promises.
Uncertain privacy, bad validation, missing evidence, or resource pressure means the experiment stops rather than improvises.
Models, prompts, and agent policies advance only when builds, tests, benchmarks, and held-out evaluations say they should.
Learning loop
A model does not get to declare itself better. Real tasks generate evidence. Verified evidence becomes curated learning data. Challengers then have to beat the current champion on frozen evaluations before anything changes.
Hard cases can be escalated to a stronger teacher when policy allows, but teacher output still has to survive local verification before it is eligible for training.
Observe
Capture real work and evidence
Verify
Builds, tests, security, outcomes
Curate
Promote only useful examples
Adapt
Prompt, policy, LoRA or training
Challenge
Run frozen evaluations
Promote
Only when evidence wins
Learning data
Raw trajectories are useful, but they are not automatically good training data. We separate collection, verification, curation, evaluation-only data, and uncertain material so provenance survives the entire learning cycle.
Bronze
Prompts, tool calls, patches, failures, tests, timings, and provenance. Append-only and local when sensitive.
Silver
Schema-valid evidence, deduplicated tasks, normalized outcomes, sensitivity tags, and classified failures.
Gold
High-value examples with verification evidence. Gold means eligible for training, never automatic inclusion.
Frozen regression and adversarial tasks are evaluation-only. Dataset generation should fail if holdout material leaks into training.
Possible secrets, malformed trajectories, unverified teacher output, and uncertain provenance stay out of the learning pipeline until resolved.
Tactics
We are deliberately testing improvements to tools, memory, prompts, model weights, evaluation, and orchestration separately so a score increase has a traceable cause.
Why
One machine, several competing workloads.
Tactic
Measure memory first, then allow, queue, or deny work before it can destabilize the host.
Why
A new agent can look better while quietly regressing.
Tactic
Run challengers beside the champion in isolated worktrees and compare outcomes before promotion.
Why
A failed run is wasted if the system can repeat it tomorrow.
Tactic
Turn verified failures into reproducible regression candidates and permanent evaluation cases.
Why
Some code and data should never leave the machine.
Tactic
Separate offline, cloud-allowed, and adversarial workloads with explicit policy boundaries.
Daily log
Entries are intentionally compact. Private infrastructure details, credentials, personal information, and confidential source material are excluded.
August 22, 2026
The local AI lab moved from architecture sketches to a tested, shadow-only learning control plane: provenance, Medallion promotion, evaluation, resource planning, experiment manifests, model governance, and public-safe outcome tracking now exist before any training workload is allowed to run.
Control-plane tests
26 passed
Training runs
0 — by design
Production disruption
None
Runtime mutation
None
Use CerbiStream inside selected applications, Cerbi Gateway at the OpenTelemetry boundary, or both. CerbiShield keeps policy, rollout, violations, audit, and evidence under one governance program.